Taxing the low-paid in order to cancel the loans of better-paid university graduates is unfair, unnecessary and unlikely to influence the courses that students choose to study.
Imagine if the Govt said, "We are going to send you free money - $10,000 say - but only if you went to university. That will be sole criterion as to whether you get it". How is repaying the loans of students any different?
Imagine if the Govt said, "We are going to send you free money - $10,000 say - but only if you went to university. That will be sole criterion as to whether you get it". How is repaying the loans of students any different?
It's not any different. You have succinctly summarised my argument in three lines! SS